Re: sygate 5.5 free not active ?
- From: Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers <usenet-2006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 19 Jan 2006 18:38:45 GMT
Casey Klc wrote:
> In article <43ce8bc7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, bumens@xxxxxxxxxxx says...
>> Sygate has a big design flaw as a "Personal Firewall" - its system
>> services are opening windows. This is a security breach, because this
>> opens additional attack vectors, your system does not have with the
>> Windows-Firewall instead.
>
> Are you referring to operating system services not being controlled
> by Sygate firewall.
No. Sygate installs a system service (runs with elevated privileges, so
it can do all the filtering stuff). Contradictory to the MS guidelines
this service has windows attached to it (for the configuration UI).
These windows make the service susceptible to shatter attacks.
cu
59cobalt
--
"Der Computer ist da, um zu rechnen, nicht um Ausreden wie 'Kann nicht
durch Null teilen' auf den Bildschirm zu schreiben."
--Marco Haschka in de.org.ccc
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Sygate Firewall---Shatter Attack Fixed
- From: Casey Klc
- Re: sygate 5.5 free not active ?
- From: Casey Klc
- Re: sygate 5.5 free not active ?
- From: KŪ54
- Sygate Firewall---Shatter Attack Fixed
- References:
- sygate 5.5 free not active ?
- From: KŪ54
- Re: sygate 5.5 free not active ?
- From: Volker Birk
- Re: sygate 5.5 free not active ?
- From: Casey Klc
- sygate 5.5 free not active ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Open ports on a cisco PIX 501
- Next by Date: Re: sygate 5.5 free not active ?
- Previous by thread: Re: sygate 5.5 free not active ?
- Next by thread: Re: sygate 5.5 free not active ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|