Re: Ports getting hammered?
- From: Volker Birk <bumens@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 10 Jan 2006 06:58:27 +0100
Somebody. <somebody.@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
> All of these methods relate to the arresting of the "phoning home" behavior
> you're referring to, and form an important part of a fully implemented
> security strategy in my opinion. Ignoring or accepting all outbound session
> traffic as valid is simply bad security and easily leads to serious and
> complete compromise scenarios.
What would you comment for breakout-en.c?
Yours,
VB.
--
Ein vision statement ist in aller Regel planfreies Gelalle einer Horde
realitätsferner Spinner.
Dietz Pröpper in d.a.s.r
.
- References:
- Ports getting hammered?
- From: SHRED
- Re: Ports getting hammered?
- From: Duane Arnold
- Re: Ports getting hammered?
- From: SHRED
- Re: Ports getting hammered?
- From: Duane Arnold
- Re: Ports getting hammered?
- From: SHRED
- Re: Ports getting hammered?
- From: Somebody.
- Re: Ports getting hammered?
- From: Duane Arnold
- Re: Ports getting hammered?
- From: Somebody.
- Ports getting hammered?
- Prev by Date: Re: Wired router as firewall
- Next by Date: Re: What appliance to buy?
- Previous by thread: Re: Ports getting hammered?
- Next by thread: Re: Ports getting hammered?
- Index(es):