Re: Recurrent question
- From: Kerodo <loopback@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 13:00:41 -0800
In article <40g0bdF196jroU2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, usenet-2005
@planetcobalt.net says...
> Kerodo wrote:
> > He can be somewhat interesting, however, his stance and arguments are
> > way too black and white. He leaves no room for anything else.. which
> > is not good.
>
> Security is binary. Either you are secure in a given scenario, or you
> are not. There's no middle ground.
>
> cu
> 59cobalt
>
Nonsense.. Things will always be changing, and although you may be
secure one day, tomorrow you may not.
--
Kerodo
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Recurrent question
- From: Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers
- Re: Recurrent question
- References:
- Recurrent question
- From: GRL
- Re: Recurrent question
- From: Volker Birk
- Re: Recurrent question
- From: Sla#s
- Re: Recurrent question
- From: Volker Birk
- Re: Recurrent question
- From: Ric
- Re: Recurrent question
- From: Quaestor
- Re: Recurrent question
- From: Ric
- Re: Recurrent question
- From: Kerodo
- Re: Recurrent question
- From: Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers
- Recurrent question
- Prev by Date: Re: Recurrent question
- Next by Date: Re: Recurrent question
- Previous by thread: Re: Recurrent question
- Next by thread: Re: Recurrent question
- Index(es):