Re: Recurrent question
- From: Kerodo <loopback@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 09:40:02 -0800
In article <43a164e9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, bumens@xxxxxxxxxxx says...
> Kerodo <loopback@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Yep, just because something isn't perfect 100% of the time doesn't mean
> > it's useless.
>
> "Personal Firewalls" aren't "not 100% perfect". They're completely useless
> because of being superseeded by the Windows-Firewall,
That's completely ridiculous. They do entirely different things.
--
Kerodo
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Recurrent question
- From: Volker Birk
- Re: Recurrent question
- From: Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers
- Re: Recurrent question
- References:
- Recurrent question
- From: GRL
- Re: Recurrent question
- From: Volker Birk
- Re: Recurrent question
- From: Sla#s
- Re: Recurrent question
- From: Volker Birk
- Re: Recurrent question
- From: Ric
- Re: Recurrent question
- From: Kerodo
- Re: Recurrent question
- From: Volker Birk
- Recurrent question
- Prev by Date: Re: WinXP SP2 firewall
- Next by Date: Re: 2 questions to Sygate firewall users
- Previous by thread: Re: Recurrent question
- Next by thread: Re: Recurrent question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|