Re: Recurrent question
- From: Volker Birk <bumens@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 15 Dec 2005 13:43:21 +0100
Kerodo <loopback@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Yep, just because something isn't perfect 100% of the time doesn't mean
> it's useless.
"Personal Firewalls" aren't "not 100% perfect". They're completely useless
because of being superseeded by the Windows-Firewall, but many of them are
dangerous because of their security breaches, especially Symantec Norton,
Outpost and Sygate. And they're very dangerous, because their "security"
relies on user's decisions, which is a b0rken concept and a security
breach itself, as with Zone Alarm, for example.
Yours,
VB.
--
"Ich bin ein freier Mensch und werde jetzt von meinen Freiheitsrechten
Gebrauch machen - und zwar ausgiebig - natürlich nur in dem Rahmen, den
Otto Schily mir noch zur Verfügung stellt."
Wolfgang Clement am 10.10.05 als Noch-Superminister
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Recurrent question
- From: Iceman
- Re: Recurrent question
- From: Kerodo
- Re: Recurrent question
- References:
- Recurrent question
- From: GRL
- Re: Recurrent question
- From: Volker Birk
- Re: Recurrent question
- From: Sla#s
- Re: Recurrent question
- From: Volker Birk
- Re: Recurrent question
- From: Ric
- Re: Recurrent question
- From: Kerodo
- Recurrent question
- Prev by Date: Re: Firebox II Basic Setup
- Next by Date: Re: Recurrent question
- Previous by thread: Re: Recurrent question
- Next by thread: Re: Recurrent question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|