Re: avoid the bloat?
From: Mike Gasson (mtg_at_durlston.demon.co.uk)
Date: 10/25/05
- Previous message: andrewmmorris_at_gmail.com: "Re: I need help with a Netscreen NS25."
- In reply to: Stephen Michael: "Re: avoid the bloat?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 22:28:14 +0100
In message <fha5l1davaen08hbtbmq5qhpppeoloc31k@4ax.com>, Stephen Michael
<jans123z@gmx.net> writes
>
>Kerio 2.1.5 is perfectly stable on Windows XP and uses almost no
>resources. I believe the version 2.1.4 had a few security issues but
>2.1.5 fixed them. Pricelessware.org list Kerio 2.1.5 as pricelessware.
>Kerio 2.1.5 uses MD5 signatures to validate or verify programs that
>communicate out on the internet. MD5 is virtually impossible to fool.
>Stephen Michael at jans123z@gmx.net.
I'm confused! I've been using Kerio 4.2.1 then 4.2.2 and as you probably
know, this version is due to finish end of December so it will be
unsupported. Is 2.1.5 still supported or will it not need supporting?
I like Kerio and would prefer to stick with it, but I don't want to keep
using it if there's no support.
>
>
>On 1 Oct 2005 16:00:41 GMT, lee walters
><pepplewickTAKEAWAY@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Not particularly wanting to take on the bloatware of the next update of
>>Zone Alarm, would it be a risk (security-wise or for an XP OS) to go
>>back down to a 2.1 or 3.1 version?? I just really want a decent
>>firewall that protects my system wihtout the tonnes of Megabytes of
>>memory used up. Or is there a freeware/paid for version out there
>>that's as good and a lower resource puller. TIA.
-- Mike Gasson (from the Isle of Purbeck)
- Previous message: andrewmmorris_at_gmail.com: "Re: I need help with a Netscreen NS25."
- In reply to: Stephen Michael: "Re: avoid the bloat?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
