Re: avoid the bloat?
From: Stephen Michael (jans123z_at_gmx.net)
Date: 10/16/05
- Previous message: Duane Arnold: "Re: Secure Web Browsing via Terminal Server/Citrix"
- In reply to: lee walters: "avoid the bloat?"
- Next in thread: Mike Gasson: "Re: avoid the bloat?"
- Reply: Mike Gasson: "Re: avoid the bloat?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 19:33:16 GMT
Kerio 2.1.5 is perfectly stable on Windows XP and uses almost no
resources. I believe the version 2.1.4 had a few security issues but
2.1.5 fixed them. Pricelessware.org list Kerio 2.1.5 as pricelessware.
Kerio 2.1.5 uses MD5 signatures to validate or verify programs that
communicate out on the internet. MD5 is virtually impossible to fool.
Stephen Michael at jans123z@gmx.net.
On 1 Oct 2005 16:00:41 GMT, lee walters
<pepplewickTAKEAWAY@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Not particularly wanting to take on the bloatware of the next update of
>Zone Alarm, would it be a risk (security-wise or for an XP OS) to go
>back down to a 2.1 or 3.1 version?? I just really want a decent
>firewall that protects my system wihtout the tonnes of Megabytes of
>memory used up. Or is there a freeware/paid for version out there
>that's as good and a lower resource puller. TIA.
- Previous message: Duane Arnold: "Re: Secure Web Browsing via Terminal Server/Citrix"
- In reply to: lee walters: "avoid the bloat?"
- Next in thread: Mike Gasson: "Re: avoid the bloat?"
- Reply: Mike Gasson: "Re: avoid the bloat?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|