Re: Secure Web Browsing via Terminal Server/Citrix
From: Duane Arnold (notme_at_notme.com)
Date: 10/17/05
- Next message: Stephen Michael: "Re: avoid the bloat?"
- Previous message: Kerodo: "Re: GhostWall"
- In reply to: rot-eron: "Secure Web Browsing via Terminal Server/Citrix"
- Next in thread: Volker Birk: "Re: Secure Web Browsing via Terminal Server/Citrix"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 00:00:19 GMT
"rot-eron" <rotero2@yahoo.com> wrote in news:1129497662.548012.222370
@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
> Hi,
>
>
> I recently came across a unique security architecture in an Insurance
> Firm I am dealing with. They put a Citrix/TS farm in their DMZ, hosting
> only IE and closed outbound port 80/443.
>
> This way, internal users can *not* access the web, unless they use the
> TS, which is easier to manager, easier to secure, and sits in the DMZ -
> without access to the internal network. The additional benefit is that
> the internal network is, in a way, separate/disconnected from the
> Internet - with all the security benefits associated with that.
>
> Has anyone seen this elsewhere?
> What do you think of this approach to solving the browsing
> security-related problems?
>
No and I have worked in a Citrix Terminal Server Farm situation. It
sounds kind of rediculous.
Duane :)
- Next message: Stephen Michael: "Re: avoid the bloat?"
- Previous message: Kerodo: "Re: GhostWall"
- In reply to: rot-eron: "Secure Web Browsing via Terminal Server/Citrix"
- Next in thread: Volker Birk: "Re: Secure Web Browsing via Terminal Server/Citrix"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|