Re: Advanced Rules/Advanced Application Configuration
From: Duane Arnold (notme_at_notme.com)
Date: 10/12/05
- Next message: Somebody.: "Re: March 29, 2006 total eclipse - IT admin's WORST NIGHTMARE"
- Previous message: John Hyde: "VPN Choices"
- In reply to: Casey Klc: "Re: Advanced Rules/Advanced Application Configuration"
- Next in thread: Casey Klc: "Re: Advanced Rules/Advanced Application Configuration"
- Reply: Casey Klc: "Re: Advanced Rules/Advanced Application Configuration"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 18:46:47 GMT
Casey Klc <casey@notspecified.net> wrote in
news:MPG.1db70de7fcd5b4ab9896da@news.east.earthlink.net:
>
>>
>> Don't use Application Control like the worthless crutch that it is
that
>> can easily be beaten by malware.
>>
>> Duane :)
>>
>>
> Nonsense. Your caution should have stated.....Don't download malware
> off internet and don't accept an email malware attachment.
> Sygate is an excellent firewall when properly setup to "Block
Everything
> you Don't Use".
> Casey
>
Nonsense back to you and App Control in a PFW solution can be beaten at
the computer boot and logon process. I have tested Sygate and most of the
3rd party solutions for this. And Sygate can be beaten at that time like
the rest of the 3rd party solutions, since it is not an integrated part
of the O/S that can get to the TCP/IP connection first before anything
else such as malware. Application Control is worthless in PFW solutions
for the most part and may hold a little value (that's very little IMHO)
if the machine is never booted. I am sure there are other ways to beat it
but at the boot I am for sure.
And anyone using a PFW solution like a crutch and depends solely upon
such a solution to control program and/or have the solution tell them
what's happening on the machine without look for themselves with other
tools or control what's happening with a program through the O/S has
already lost.
And on top of that, I don't even consider a PFW solution to be a FW
solution since it doesn't separate two networks but only provides machine
level protection for the O/S and Internet applications running on the
machine. But that's my opinion of a PFW solution.
Duane :)
- Next message: Somebody.: "Re: March 29, 2006 total eclipse - IT admin's WORST NIGHTMARE"
- Previous message: John Hyde: "VPN Choices"
- In reply to: Casey Klc: "Re: Advanced Rules/Advanced Application Configuration"
- Next in thread: Casey Klc: "Re: Advanced Rules/Advanced Application Configuration"
- Reply: Casey Klc: "Re: Advanced Rules/Advanced Application Configuration"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|