Re: March 29, 2006 total eclipse - IT admin's WORST NIGHTMARE
From: Charles Newman (charlesnewman1_at_comcast.spamkiller.net)
Date: 10/11/05
- Previous message: Clive: "Re: Least cpu-intensive firewall and antivirus?"
- In reply to: Moe Trin: "Re: March 29, 2006 total eclipse - IT admin's WORST NIGHTMARE"
- Next in thread: Leythos: "Re: March 29, 2006 total eclipse - IT admin's WORST NIGHTMARE"
- Reply: Moe Trin: "Re: March 29, 2006 total eclipse - IT admin's WORST NIGHTMARE"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 15:13:42 -0700
X-No-Archive: Yes
"Moe Trin" <ibuprofin@painkiller.example.tld> wrote in message
news:slrndkgtqr.luo.ibuprofin@compton.phx.az.us...
> In the Usenet newsgroup comp.security.firewalls, in article
> Is that what you were taught by your bean counter instructor? Here's
> a free clue - consult a lawyer before you try that, lest the state
> of California Department of Industrial Relations comes down on your
> a$$. Think I'm joking? Ask a rather large chain of stores with a
> California headquarters near the Oakland/Bay bridge about that. (Can't
> believe they were _that_ stupid.)
We were taught in certain business managment courses, that unless
you actually have the content they were downloading, you don't
dare use inappropriate internet usage as a reason to fire someone.
You look for another reason to fire them. That is what I was
taught in busienss management courses at one time.
- Previous message: Clive: "Re: Least cpu-intensive firewall and antivirus?"
- In reply to: Moe Trin: "Re: March 29, 2006 total eclipse - IT admin's WORST NIGHTMARE"
- Next in thread: Leythos: "Re: March 29, 2006 total eclipse - IT admin's WORST NIGHTMARE"
- Reply: Moe Trin: "Re: March 29, 2006 total eclipse - IT admin's WORST NIGHTMARE"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]