Re: Don't use a Firewall other than Windows Firewall?
From: Volker Birk (bumens_at_dingens.org)
Date: 09/30/05
- Next message: Volker Birk: "Re: zonealarm on windows server 2003"
- Previous message: Mark: "Re: Speed of firewall with AV/DI"
- In reply to: Mark: "Re: Don't use a Firewall other than Windows Firewall?"
- Next in thread: jameshanley39_at_yahoo.co.uk: "Re: Don't use a Firewall other than Windows Firewall?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 30 Sep 2005 08:15:25 +0200
Mark <nothere@notthere.com> wrote:
["Outbound application control"]
> Sorry, we're talking different things. You're talking personal firewalls -
> I'm talking appliances.
BTW: it's not possible to prevent tunneling without losing connectivity
by using appliances, too. This is problem on principle.
This is, why therefore some people choose the second best option - Virus
Scanners and IDS. Those cannot be perfect, but they can detect the well
known attacks.
Yours,
VB.
--
MAC-Filtering bringt so viel Schutz vor "Hackern" wie Zeitungspapier vor
einer Atombome. (MAC filtering is protecting against "hackers" like newsprint
is protecting against a nuclear bomb)
- Christian Forler in de.comp.security.misc
- Next message: Volker Birk: "Re: zonealarm on windows server 2003"
- Previous message: Mark: "Re: Speed of firewall with AV/DI"
- In reply to: Mark: "Re: Don't use a Firewall other than Windows Firewall?"
- Next in thread: jameshanley39_at_yahoo.co.uk: "Re: Don't use a Firewall other than Windows Firewall?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
