Re: RFC 2979
From: Volker Birk (bumens_at_dingens.org)
Date: 08/30/05
- Next message: Volker Birk: "Re: Help with AtGuard"
- Previous message: Volker Birk: "Re: firewalls and email"
- In reply to:(deleted message) CyberDroog: "Re: RFC 2979"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 30 Aug 2005 07:05:53 +0200
CyberDroog <CyberDroog@clockworkorange.com> wrote:
> Routing doesn't make a firewall, per se (although the
> side effect offers more security than nothing at all), but filtering does.
> Most all simple NAT router/firewalls offer some filtering capabilities.
> Hence the use of the word firewall in the product description.
This all depends on definition BTW:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Definition
I introduced the definition of the IETF here, because we were talking
about Internet security.
Yours,
VB.
--
"Es kann nicht sein, dass die Frustrierten in Rom bestimmen, was in
deutschen Schlafzimmern passiert".
Harald Schmidt zum "Weltjugendtag"
- Next message: Volker Birk: "Re: Help with AtGuard"
- Previous message: Volker Birk: "Re: firewalls and email"
- In reply to:(deleted message) CyberDroog: "Re: RFC 2979"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|