Re: 2 firewalls 1 Internet connection
From: Volker Birk (bumens_at_dingens.org)
Date: 08/29/05
- Next message: Volker Birk: "Re: 2 firewalls 1 Internet connection"
- Previous message: Jim Simpson: "Re: ZA blocking email"
- In reply to: Brian: "Re: 2 firewalls 1 Internet connection"
- Next in thread: Brian: "Re: 2 firewalls 1 Internet connection"
- Reply: Brian: "Re: 2 firewalls 1 Internet connection"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 29 Aug 2005 22:02:17 +0200
Brian <Brian@amphenolpcd.com> wrote:
> Please note I inherited this network - it was not my design.
Perhaps this is a good time to review the design ;-)
> Both VPNs use our internal network as the endpoint. Each firewall was
> chosen as an effort to guarantee stability of the tunnel, as the PIX is
> connected to another PIX, the Firebox to another Firebox.
Hm... there are standards for doing this, so this is not needed
usually.
> I need our internal network to remain the endpoint for both tunnels;
> servers here are used by both China and Mexico.
> Can I have two firewalls be "equals" behind our Internet access router?
Yes. This is unusual; and with the requirements you sketched, perhaps
this is not necessary.
Yours,
VB.
--
"Es kann nicht sein, dass die Frustrierten in Rom bestimmen, was in
deutschen Schlafzimmern passiert".
Harald Schmidt zum "Weltjugendtag"
- Next message: Volker Birk: "Re: 2 firewalls 1 Internet connection"
- Previous message: Jim Simpson: "Re: ZA blocking email"
- In reply to: Brian: "Re: 2 firewalls 1 Internet connection"
- Next in thread: Brian: "Re: 2 firewalls 1 Internet connection"
- Reply: Brian: "Re: 2 firewalls 1 Internet connection"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|