Re: NAT is not a mechanism for securing a network.. but.. HELP!
From: Volker Birk (bumens_at_dingens.org)
Date: 08/28/05
- Next message: Nicky: "Re: NAT is not a mechanism for securing a network.. but.. HELP!"
- Previous message: Volker Birk: "Re: NAT is not a mechanism for securing a network.. but.. HELP!"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Leythos: "Re: NAT is not a mechanism for securing a network.. but.. HELP!"
- Next in thread: CyberDroog: "Re: NAT is not a mechanism for securing a network.. but.. HELP!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 28 Aug 2005 08:46:17 +0200
Leythos <void@nowhere.lan> wrote:
> > A "firewall" is an agent which screens network traffic in some way,
> > blocking traffic it believes to be inappropriate, dangerous, or both.
> > (RFC 2979, Behavior of and Requirements for Internet Firewalls)
> ...
> And if you don't believe my other post following this, then a Switch
> with VLAN's is also a firewall - which we all know is not true.
I cannot see that a Switch with VLAN is blocking any traffic. If I configure
port filtering on a device, this device definitly is blocking traffic.
Yours,
VB.
--
"Es kann nicht sein, dass die Frustrierten in Rom bestimmen, was in
deutschen Schlafzimmern passiert".
Harald Schmidt zum "Weltjugendtag"
- Next message: Nicky: "Re: NAT is not a mechanism for securing a network.. but.. HELP!"
- Previous message: Volker Birk: "Re: NAT is not a mechanism for securing a network.. but.. HELP!"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Leythos: "Re: NAT is not a mechanism for securing a network.. but.. HELP!"
- Next in thread: CyberDroog: "Re: NAT is not a mechanism for securing a network.. but.. HELP!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|