Re: NAT is not a mechanism for securing a network.. but.. HELP!

From: Duane Arnold (notme_at_notme.com)
Date: 08/26/05 

Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 17:57:40 GMT

CyberDroog <CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com> wrote in
news:uggug1da405quniqgjhtuupr8aen2iben7@news.easynews.com:

> On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 23:36:23 GMT, Duane Arnold <notme@notme.com>
> wrote:
>
>>> Your system is absolutely insecure. I can break into your house and
>>> literally take your whole PC. Why don't you get a *real* firewall?
>>> ;)
>>>
>>>
>>
>>And one other thing, you already indicated that you lurk around your
>>apartment complex looking at wireless possibilities. So I wouldn't put
>>anything past you. Please, please, please and please some more don't
>>mess with my little setup as you're too *dangerous*. <g>
>
> I'm beginning to question your ability to decipher sarcasm.
>
> I'll add a ;) here so you don't know if I'm being serious or not.
>

Well if it is not Dangerous little Cyberdrool. What's next out of your
mouth?

Duane :)