Re: NAT is not a mechanism for securing a network.. but.. HELP!
From: Duane Arnold (notme_at_notme.com)
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 17:57:40 GMT
CyberDroog <CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com> wrote in
> On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 23:36:23 GMT, Duane Arnold <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>>> Your system is absolutely insecure. I can break into your house and
>>> literally take your whole PC. Why don't you get a *real* firewall?
>>And one other thing, you already indicated that you lurk around your
>>apartment complex looking at wireless possibilities. So I wouldn't put
>>anything past you. Please, please, please and please some more don't
>>mess with my little setup as you're too *dangerous*. <g>
> I'm beginning to question your ability to decipher sarcasm.
> I'll add a ;) here so you don't know if I'm being serious or not.
Well if it is not Dangerous little Cyberdrool. What's next out of your