Re: NAT is not a mechanism for securing a network.. but.. HELP!
From: Leythos (void_at_nowhere.lan)
Date: 08/25/05
- Next message: Moe Trin: "Re: Is There a Virus that Breaks DNS?"
- Previous message: Duane Arnold: "Re: NAT is not a mechanism for securing a network.. but.. HELP!"
- In reply to:(deleted message) CyberDroog: "Re: NAT is not a mechanism for securing a network.. but.. HELP!"
- Next in thread: Duane Arnold: "Re: NAT is not a mechanism for securing a network.. but.. HELP!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 19:20:32 GMT
In article <uu2sg1l212a7922ko3hgmo6lib6cc0076e@news.easynews.com>,
CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com says...
> On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 00:49:14 GMT, Duane Arnold <notme@notme.com> wrote:
>
> >> Keep trying, you're still not showing any reason to allow full,
> >> unrestricted, open, access to everyone in a company.
> >>
> >
> >And if you do have unrestricted Internet access and was using it a bit too
> >much in the management's eye, you will hear about it. One guy was rolled on
> >the carpet about that and another one was doing a little too much emailing
> >on company time. They do watch what's going on.
>
> And they face legal problems if they don't address the issue with some
> standards. I've seen quite a few companies who actually put wording in
> their internet use policies to the effect that "a little" personal use is
> tolerable.
>
> That will be a real pain for them if they ever end up in court. If someone
> is fired for personal use of the internet and they can show that the
> company knows other employees engage in personal use, the company is going
> to have a problem.
Yep, sure is. We always state NO PERSONAL USE, and then define clearly
what we consider personal Use (a non-inclusive list, but it covers about
15 things), and that all communications across company systems with any
internal or external person, business, device, etc... belong to the
company and can and will be inspected at any time. We also have a policy
that all media of any type may be inspected at any type, including
personal media.
We've actually found people working for other companies during security
audits for other companies (meaning that employee of company A was also
working for company B on Company A network and time - without knowledge
or permission from company A)... We had to search their home, which they
agreed too, for documents and media that belonged to the company - all
with their permission (to keep from filing a lawsuit against them).
-- spam999free@rrohio.com remove 999 in order to email me
- Next message: Moe Trin: "Re: Is There a Virus that Breaks DNS?"
- Previous message: Duane Arnold: "Re: NAT is not a mechanism for securing a network.. but.. HELP!"
- In reply to:(deleted message) CyberDroog: "Re: NAT is not a mechanism for securing a network.. but.. HELP!"
- Next in thread: Duane Arnold: "Re: NAT is not a mechanism for securing a network.. but.. HELP!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|