Re: Checkpoint NG AI VPN nated
From: Drx (read_at_from.sign)
Date: 08/24/05
- Next message: Volker Birk: "Re: NAT is not a mechanism for securing a network.. but.. HELP!"
- Previous message: Volker Birk: "Re: NAT is not a mechanism for securing a network.. but.. HELP!"
- In reply to: Memnoch: "Re: Checkpoint NG AI VPN nated"
- Next in thread: Memnoch: "Re: Checkpoint NG AI VPN nated"
- Reply: Memnoch: "Re: Checkpoint NG AI VPN nated"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 13:20:51 +0200
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 20:36:31 GMT, Memnoch wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 17:51:23 +0200, no@no.no wrote:
>
>>My VPN gateway is behind NAT device. Is it possible to achive VPN
>>connectivity from SecureClient to this VPN gateway in this scenario?
>
> This was asked only recently. Yes, you just need to make sure the relevant
> ports are forwarded on the NAT box to the gateway.
Well i am not sure. My system does not have public IP on VPN gateway and I
think it does not work because of that.
- Next message: Volker Birk: "Re: NAT is not a mechanism for securing a network.. but.. HELP!"
- Previous message: Volker Birk: "Re: NAT is not a mechanism for securing a network.. but.. HELP!"
- In reply to: Memnoch: "Re: Checkpoint NG AI VPN nated"
- Next in thread: Memnoch: "Re: Checkpoint NG AI VPN nated"
- Reply: Memnoch: "Re: Checkpoint NG AI VPN nated"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
