Re: Homeland Insecurity?
From: me (none_at_nospam.invalid)
Date: 08/01/05
- Next message: [_ '] |_| (_] ]_ |_| (_]: "Re: Homeland Insecurity?"
- Previous message: Alan Strassberg: "Re: Routing on Netscreen 5XP"
- In reply to: BC: "Re: Homeland Insecurity?"
- Next in thread: Leythos: "Re: Homeland Insecurity?"
- Reply:(deleted message) Leythos: "Re: Homeland Insecurity?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 22:36:22 -0500
On 31 Jul 2005 in news:1122856335.177922.74900@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
"BC" <callmebc@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm not sure what to think when someone claims
> that they've been running Windows and Exchange
> and blah, blah, blah for ages without a problem
I do. They're either lying or ignorant.
> when I personally know of companies and
> institutions with seemingly fortress-like
> protection (mostly because they are required to)
> still getting hacked and infected on a regular
> basis. And considering that IE cannot be made
> secure without making it unusably crippled, and
> that Outlook/Exchange systems tend to behave
> typically more like software Chernobyls, even
> in Redmond....
>
> Not that I'm casting any aspersions.
>
> -BC
>
>
- Next message: [_ '] |_| (_] ]_ |_| (_]: "Re: Homeland Insecurity?"
- Previous message: Alan Strassberg: "Re: Routing on Netscreen 5XP"
- In reply to: BC: "Re: Homeland Insecurity?"
- Next in thread: Leythos: "Re: Homeland Insecurity?"
- Reply:(deleted message) Leythos: "Re: Homeland Insecurity?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|