Re: Easy port question
From: Old Guy (jay.lunis_at_gmail.com)
Date: 06/29/05
- Next message: Roger Wilco: "Re: Trojan horse Downloader.Generic.ML"
- Previous message: Mike Easter: "Re: Easy port question"
- In reply to: Mike Easter: "Re: Easy port question"
- Next in thread: Duane Arnold: "Re: Easy port question"
- Reply: Duane Arnold: "Re: Easy port question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 16:46:47 -0400
Mike Easter wrote:
> Old Guy wrote:
>
>>Casey Klc wrote:
>
>
>>>http://www.pcflank.com/about.htm
>
>
>>Nope, it couldn't find the correct IP address.
>
>
> Are you saying that using the links at that site that lead toward the
> Advanced Port Scanner couldn't determine your IP? The advanced port
> scanner would be able to let you select one specific port to test and
> how you wanted to test it, with TCP connect or TCP syn type.
>
Yup, that's what I'm saying. BTW, I was told today I dont need to check
ports - a wireless firewall only allows 1 port in and 4 ports out. My
device instructions say it needs specific ports open. Both can't be
true, right?
> That doesn't sound right. What about http://www.whatismyip.com or
> similar.
>
> A website has to see the IP you look like or it can't send you its
> webpage.
>
Thanks. I'll try it tomorrow.
- Next message: Roger Wilco: "Re: Trojan horse Downloader.Generic.ML"
- Previous message: Mike Easter: "Re: Easy port question"
- In reply to: Mike Easter: "Re: Easy port question"
- Next in thread: Duane Arnold: "Re: Easy port question"
- Reply: Duane Arnold: "Re: Easy port question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|