Re: IPCop for Small-Business Network: Web Proxy Usage
From: Leythos (void_at_nowhere.lan)
Date: 06/22/05
- Next message: Art: "Re: Trojan horse Downloader.Generic.ML"
- Previous message: Leythos: "Re: WatchGuard FireBox v60 - Security Policy"
- In reply to: Quaestor: "Re: IPCop for Small-Business Network: Web Proxy Usage"
- Next in thread: Micheal Robert Zium: "Re: IPCop for Small-Business Network: Web Proxy Usage"
- Reply:(deleted message) Micheal Robert Zium: "Re: IPCop for Small-Business Network: Web Proxy Usage"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 10:44:53 GMT
In article <11bi0992h9gsr94@news.supernews.com>, no.spam@my.place
says...
> In all the years I have run computers I have had no virus, no trojan, no
> worm that got in, only a few outside system effects (sasser, winnuke,
> codered hitting my cicso router), which I quickly found solutions for.
> I know from which I speak.
I've been using computers since 76, can say that I've NEVER been
compromised in all that time - not run Linux for a firewall on any
system yet.
> And I speak: anytime you are setting up a network of windows machines,
> they need to communicate with the net only through a single firewall
> machine (they talk to it, it talks to the net). This firewall machine
> should be running linux, with either esmith or smoothwall firewall
> software. Keeping the firewall outside your windows machines means that
> no virus/trojan/worm/hacker has any chance at them and their extreme
> vulnerabilities until after it gets past the firewall (which has no
> performance impact on the other machines, running separately). This,
> along with a NAT router to outright block ports you just don't want
> open, is an almost perfect security combination against everything but
> trojans. Linux isn't perfect, but it's many orders of magnitude more
> secure than any windows, and thus makes the right choice for a
> firewall. Running only that one program on it, you don't need to be a
> neckbeard linux ghuru to use it.
Even a simple NAT device will block those attacks from your machine. If
every internet user would just have NAT enabled on their ISP provided
router we would all be a lot better off (by default).
-- -- spamfree999@rrohio.com (Remove 999 to reply to me)
- Next message: Art: "Re: Trojan horse Downloader.Generic.ML"
- Previous message: Leythos: "Re: WatchGuard FireBox v60 - Security Policy"
- In reply to: Quaestor: "Re: IPCop for Small-Business Network: Web Proxy Usage"
- Next in thread: Micheal Robert Zium: "Re: IPCop for Small-Business Network: Web Proxy Usage"
- Reply:(deleted message) Micheal Robert Zium: "Re: IPCop for Small-Business Network: Web Proxy Usage"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|