Re: Firewall needed behind router?
From: Moe Trin (ibuprofin_at_painkiller.example.tld)
Date: 06/15/05
- Next message: Moe Trin: "Re: Firewall needed behind router?"
- Previous message: Jason Edwards: "Re: Trojan horse Downloader.Generic.ML"
- In reply to: Charles Newman: "Re: Firewall needed behind router?"
- Next in thread: Leythos: "Re: Firewall needed behind router?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 14:55:34 -0500
In the Usenet newsgroup comp.security.firewalls, in article
<9YKdnRbv06B4XzLfRVn-2w@comcast.com>, Charles Newman wrote:
>
>"Leythos" <void@nowhere.lan> wrote in message
>> Charles, there are many ways that you can emulate Windows file formats,
>> and you can also use MS Office on Linux if you know anything about the
>> non-MS world.
>
> Well, either Windows or Windows emulation.
>If people are not using Windows, they are using
>Windows emulation.
Tell me Charles, was Word Perfect an emulation of MS Word? Was Lotus 123
an emulation of Excel? Why do you think a similar application has to be
an emulation of an overpriced microsoft product?
And you still haven't identified this "college" you attended that networking
class.
Old guy
- Next message: Moe Trin: "Re: Firewall needed behind router?"
- Previous message: Jason Edwards: "Re: Trojan horse Downloader.Generic.ML"
- In reply to: Charles Newman: "Re: Firewall needed behind router?"
- Next in thread: Leythos: "Re: Firewall needed behind router?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]