Re: Firewall needed behind router?
From: Charles Newman (charlesnewman1_at_comcast.spammers.go.away.net)
Date: 06/14/05
- Previous message: Moe Trin: "Re: Firewall needed behind router?"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Leythos: "Re: Firewall needed behind router?"
- Next in thread: Leythos: "Re: Firewall needed behind router?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 20:16:35 -0700
"Leythos" <void@nowhere.lan> wrote in message
news:MPG.1d17f8013f39cfc398990a@news-server.columbus.rr.com...
> In article <Q-ydnRe5f_hoVDDfRVn-2w@comcast.com>, charlesnewman1
> @comcast.spammers.go.away.net says...
> > I am going on what they taught me in networking
> > class in college in 1999. We were taught everything
> > you ever wanted to know about Microsoft Networking.
> > That is becuase Microsoft dominated the computing
> > world back then and still does today. Windows runs
> > more than 95 percent of the world's computers.
>
> In 1999 MS DID NOT DOMINATE THE NETWORKING WORLD, networking and MS have
> very little to do with each other. MS utilizes networks, but does not
> make any networking devices, no routers, no switches, no anything
They do have their own buit-in router, ICS, though
I do find third party software to be much more
secure as not as vulerable to attack as the Microsoft
ICS program
- Previous message: Moe Trin: "Re: Firewall needed behind router?"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Leythos: "Re: Firewall needed behind router?"
- Next in thread: Leythos: "Re: Firewall needed behind router?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
