Re: Firewall needed behind router?
From: Moe Trin (ibuprofin_at_painkiller.example.tld)
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 20:49:48 -0500
In the Usenet newsgroup comp.security.firewalls, in article
<Q-ydnRe5f_hoVDDfRVnfirstname.lastname@example.org>, Charles Newman wrote:
>I am going on what they taught me in networking class in college in 1999.
I really do want to know the name of this college. It sounds more like
a MCSP class taught at Office Depot than anything a reputable school
>That is becuase Microsoft dominated the computing
>world back then and still does today. Windows runs
>more than 95 percent of the world's computers.
of which most are running at home (and badly infected), very few are servers
because of massive security problems built into the O/S, fewer still are
Internet facing, and only a few do more than perfunctory IP networking. By
the way, your 95 percent figure is advertising copy unrelated to facts.
You could find more accurate figures if you used your search engine instead
of parroting half remembered course material.
Microsoft got into TCP/IP thirteen YEARS behind the crowd. With the rest of
the world thirteen years ahead of them, they _could_ have learned from the
vast experience - but no - microsoft follows standards (including their own)
like an elephant follows migrating whales - it really can happen by chance,
but the chances are very poor, and microsoft usually goes out of it's way
to avoid this if at all possible. The result is a pirated network stack
based on Berkeley code, but otherwise butchered.