Re: Firewall needed behind router?
From: Peter in New Zealand (peterbalplug_at_xtra.co.nz)
Date: 06/10/05
- Next message: Wolfgang Kueter: "Re: RST instead of FIN with Windows XP SP2 Firewall"
- Previous message: Chuck: "Re: Firewall needed behind router?"
- In reply to: Chuck: "Re: Firewall needed behind router?"
- Next in thread: Chuck: "Re: Firewall needed behind router?"
- Reply: Chuck: "Re: Firewall needed behind router?"
- Reply: Wolfgang Kueter: "Re: Firewall needed behind router?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 11:18:50 +1200
-- Peter in New Zealand. (Pull the plug out to reply.) Collector of old cameras, tropical fish fancier, good coffee nutter, and compulsive computer fiddler. "Chuck" <none@example.net> wrote in message news:87dha1hhci274ggpi6c5am2ul5s632jek2@4ax.com... > On Thu, 9 Jun 2005 20:09:09 +1200, "Peter in New Zealand" > <peterbalplug@xtra.co.nz> wrote: > >>I have three PCs on a LAN which is connected to the Internet via the >>modem/router unit. Is there any advantage in having a software firewall >>(in >>this case McAfee) on these machines, or would the router be sufficient >>protection? There's no requirement for inter-PC protection - just from the >>Internet. We just recently upgraded to broadband after a decade of dialup, >>so it is all a bit new to me. The tech told me the router is configured to >>prevent DOS and hacker attacks, and I understand a little of the theory, >>but >>not a lot, so I apologise if this is a silly question. Thank heaps for >>helping. > > Peter, > > This isn't a silly question. This question gets asked almost daily, and > should > be asked more. > > If you have multiple computers on a LAN, and any one of them is used for > Internet access of any type, you should have a personal firewall on each > one of > them. If any one of them should get infected, it could be with a combined > threat that enters the LAN as browser data, and then attacks other > computers on > the LAN. Having a PFW on each one could save the others, and could alert > you to > the infection. http://nitecruzr.blogspot.com/2005/05/please-protect-yourself-layer-your.html > > The broadband tech needs to educate himself a bit more. Why do you think > that > there's no requirement for inter-PC protection? > > -- Brilliant, that's what I needed to know. It makes a heap of sense to me, which was why I needed some expert guidance, and I enjoyed reading the blog. The "tech" perhaps needs a brief explanation. Telecom NZ have been threatened with being forced to unbundle their lines for other ISPs unless they make it easier and cheaper for people to get onto broadband. The deadline is looming and their are keen to get the required numbers onto it before it expires. That's how I got onto it after a decade of dialup. The whole deal, with the cabling and router supplied cost me a grand total of $56NZ. This sort of deal has triggered a huge surge of demand, and anyone who can push a plug into a hole basically is being called a tech and put into the field to meet the demand. Mostly their answers are canned responses learned by rote to set questions. They're a sort of walking robot FAQ I suppose. It's really funny when you ask them a question they are not programmed to answer. They kind of jam up, and stop responding. I must hasten to add that the one I dealt with was courteous, helpful, and quite ready to admit that he wasn't sure about the firewall issue, hence my question here. I appreciate your responses, and I will keep the software firewall on my machines as you suggest. Many thanks. -- Peter in New Zealand. (Pull the plug out to reply.) Collector of old cameras, tropical fish fancier, good coffee nutter, and compulsive computer fiddler.
- Next message: Wolfgang Kueter: "Re: RST instead of FIN with Windows XP SP2 Firewall"
- Previous message: Chuck: "Re: Firewall needed behind router?"
- In reply to: Chuck: "Re: Firewall needed behind router?"
- Next in thread: Chuck: "Re: Firewall needed behind router?"
- Reply: Chuck: "Re: Firewall needed behind router?"
- Reply: Wolfgang Kueter: "Re: Firewall needed behind router?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]