Re: defeating firewalls made easy
From: elaich (a_at_b.c)
Date: 05/30/05
- Next message: Dan: "Re: ZoneAlarm Pro Memory Usage?"
- Previous message: dak: "Re: Norton vs. ZoneAlarm"
- In reply to: itoii 3uvu: "Re: defeating firewalls made easy"
- Next in thread: Duane Arnold: "Re: defeating firewalls made easy"
- Reply: Duane Arnold: "Re: defeating firewalls made easy"
- Reply: Duane ;-\): "Re: defeating firewalls made easy"
- Reply: Moe Trin: "Re: defeating firewalls made easy"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 30 May 2005 02:49:57 GMT
"itoii 3uvu" <itoii3uvu@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:U0tme.2779$rb6.776@lakeread07:
> so perhaps all employers may need to adopt a "zero tolerance" policy
> with respect to employees opening e-mail from unknown senders
There is no danger from opening email from unknown senders unless you are
using Outhouse Express... which I notice everybody posting in this thread
is. So much for this forum being a home for security savvy people.
-- "No sports writers were harmed during the making of this post. And what I want to know is - why not?"
- Next message: Dan: "Re: ZoneAlarm Pro Memory Usage?"
- Previous message: dak: "Re: Norton vs. ZoneAlarm"
- In reply to: itoii 3uvu: "Re: defeating firewalls made easy"
- Next in thread: Duane Arnold: "Re: defeating firewalls made easy"
- Reply: Duane Arnold: "Re: defeating firewalls made easy"
- Reply: Duane ;-\): "Re: defeating firewalls made easy"
- Reply: Moe Trin: "Re: defeating firewalls made easy"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]