Re: Norton vs. ZoneAlarm
From: dak (comp-security-firewalls_at_spamtrap.cjb.net)
Date: 05/30/05
- Next message: elaich: "Re: defeating firewalls made easy"
- Previous message: Duane Arnold: "Re: defeating firewalls made easy"
- In reply to: googlemail2003_at_yahoo.com: "Norton vs. ZoneAlarm"
- Next in thread: Vanguard: "Re: Norton vs. ZoneAlarm"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 21:46:42 -0500
On 29 May 2005 10:20:03 -0700, googlemail2003@yahoo.com wrote:
>I just got a new computer. It came with Norton Internet Security. My
>previous computer, running Windows 98, had the personal (free) version
>of ZoneAlarm.
>
>Which is better?
>
The one that serves and/or suits your specific wants/needs.
>If I use Norton are there certain options I should change to give more
>protection?
>
I can't help there, I don't use Norton.
>I connect via cable modem so I'm always connected. ZoneAlarm had a
>setting that allowed me to virtually close the Internet connection
>after a certain amount of time passed with no activity. I cannot find
>anything similar in Norton.
>
If that's the case, then it seems you have answered your own
question, and Zone Alarm is the one that fits your particular wants
best.
-- dak My SpywareBlaster Custom Blocking List: <http://customblockinglist.cjb.net/>
- Next message: elaich: "Re: defeating firewalls made easy"
- Previous message: Duane Arnold: "Re: defeating firewalls made easy"
- In reply to: googlemail2003_at_yahoo.com: "Norton vs. ZoneAlarm"
- Next in thread: Vanguard: "Re: Norton vs. ZoneAlarm"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
