Re: Completely replace software firewall with hardware firewall?
From: Leythos (void_at_nowhere.lan)
Date: 03/23/05
- Next message: Steve: "Re: New Firewall"
- Previous message: Duane Arnold: "Re: Completely replace software firewall with hardware firewall?"
- In reply to: Jack Simmons: "Re: Completely replace software firewall with hardware firewall?"
- Next in thread: CSimmons29: "Re: Completely replace software firewall with hardware firewall?"
- Reply: CSimmons29: "Re: Completely replace software firewall with hardware firewall?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 01:00:36 GMT
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 17:26:37 -0800, Jack Simmons wrote:
>
> I read this post with great interest as I have two computers configured in
> this way, i.e. connected to a router connected to a cable modem. One machine
> running Win-XP and the other Win98SE. I can get online with both machines
> and access web pages but for some reason the Win98 machine will not download
> files (shareware, updates, etc,). The download dialog box comes up but the
> download will not start. This machine previously got online via dialup and
> had no problems downloading. Being new at this I wondered if this could be
> caused by the router or if it is just this old Win98 machine. Thanks.
The router doesn't have anything to do with downloads or much else, it's a
all or nothing type thing. Are you running a personal firewall? I suspect
that it's either a PFW or Browser security problem. Download and install
FireFox browser and see if it still happens.
> "Leythos" <void@nowhere.lan> wrote in message
> news:deH%d.37$nC.5@fe1.columbus.rr.com...
>> On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 21:43:04 +0000, Sandi wrote:
>> >
>> > Here in the UK, I am on NTL cable and have just one PC attached.
>> >
>> > My head is spinning with all the configuration rules and exceptions
>> > which need configuring for a software firewall.
>> >
>> > I thought I was doing ok with user guides like the section called:
>> > "Personal firewall configuration for cable modems"
>> > http://homepage.ntlworld.com/robin.d.h.walker/cmtips/security.html
>> >
>> > But it turns out that things are still more complicated than that.
>> > As an example, I installed Outpost and came across this advice page.
>> > http://www.outpostfirewall.com/forum/showthread.php?t=9858
>> > Oh wow. It's all too much! :-) I just want protection without
>> > becoming an enthusiast or even expert in firewall configuration.
>> >
>> > QUESTION ONE: If I buy a hardware firewall then will it completely
>> > replace the need for me to have a software firewall? That would save
>> > me some headaches!
>>
>> Nothing is perfect and nothing can protect you from all threats, not even
>> a combination of Appliance and software.
>>
>> In general, an appliance is a better bet than software, if your computer
>> were to be compromised by some means, with a software based (we call those
>> personal firewalls) the compromiser could disable your personal firewall
>> application. It's much harder to put a hole in an appliance from a
>> compromised machine that it is to put a hole in a PFW.
>>
>> > QUESTION TWO: I might get a second PC and want to attach both PCs to
>> > the cable network at the same time. I have heard I can do it with a box
>> > which includes a hardware firewall as well as some other functions. But
>> > exactly what sort of box is it that I would need? Any suggestions about
>> > recommended hardware devices would be welcome.
>>
>> Most of the devices you are going to be able to purchase under $400 are
>> called NAT Routers, they are not firewalls (even though they are called
>> Firewalls by their vendors), but they do provide what I consider the best
>> first layer of protection and would never setup a network without at least
>> that minimum layer. A NAT router acts to block unsolicited inbound
>> traffice, but in almost every case, it doesn't do anything to block
>> outbound traffic - this means nothing gets in unless your computer
>> requests it (and if you were compromised you don't personally have to
>> request anything, the virus/worm can do it without you).
>>
>> I installed a NAT Router in a Sorority, 40+ girls in a house, all with
>> different computers and versions of Windows, not one of them has been
>> compromised since we installed it, not one unsolicited packet has made it
>> inbound, and they are able to do all they need.
>>
>> Units like the Linksys BEFSX41 are nice, as are the DI804HV units from
>> D-Link, but something as cheap as the Linksys BEFSR41 unit will do as well
>> as most SOHO units.
>>
>> One nice thing about the Linksys units is that you can also run a free
>> program called WallWatcher to monitor all inbound and outbound traffic
>> through the Linksys router - it lets you see what's happening in
>> real-time, so, once you learn to read it, you can see if your computer's
>> been compromised. I don't run a personal firewall on any computer behind a
>> NAT Router or Firewall Appliance, but I also know how to secure the
>> computers so that I don't need one.
>>
>> --
>> spam999free@rrohio.com
>> remove 999 in order to email me
>>
-- spam999free@rrohio.com remove 999 in order to email me
- Next message: Steve: "Re: New Firewall"
- Previous message: Duane Arnold: "Re: Completely replace software firewall with hardware firewall?"
- In reply to: Jack Simmons: "Re: Completely replace software firewall with hardware firewall?"
- Next in thread: CSimmons29: "Re: Completely replace software firewall with hardware firewall?"
- Reply: CSimmons29: "Re: Completely replace software firewall with hardware firewall?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|