Re: Microsoft Windows Firewall
From: bassbag (bassbag_at_bodybags.dragon.wales)
Date: 03/02/05
- Next message: Bob : "Large .dmp.zip file from ZoneAlarm ..."
- Previous message: digital1111_at_hotmail.com: "Websense and Sonicwall"
- In reply to: Gerald Vogt: "Re: Microsoft Windows Firewall"
- Next in thread: Gerald Vogt: "Re: Microsoft Windows Firewall"
- Reply: Gerald Vogt: "Re: Microsoft Windows Firewall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 17:43:21 -0000
In article <422505bb$0$971$44c9b20d@news2.asahi-net.or.jp>,
vogt@spamcop.net says...
> bassbag wrote:
> > I do.......My computer is a p3 733 w98 machine thats 5 years old .
>
> And you are running the 2005 version? If you do, I would call that a
> miracle that I have never seen before... Also, do you tried the
> difference if you uninstall the PFW?
>
> > It is opinion...As ive already mentioned my firewall uses less resources
> > than my AV.Look n stop or kerio 2.1.5 uses far less cpu and memory than
> > most Avs .
>
> Again, your's is your opinion and your experience which may not match
> with the general experience. I conclude from the experiences I have seen
> and it is thus not any more just my opinion. It is a fact that they
> cause a lot of problems and consume much CPU. You use Kerio 2 so you are
> not updated to the current state of the art. 5 years ago PFWs were not
> that intrusive and they had to work with the computers that were made at
> that time. Try upgrading to Kerio 4...
>
> > Your sense of "general truth" may apply to your personal experiences ,but
> > not mine.
>
> But you only consider your personal experience, I conclude from many
> experiences with many computers from many people. If I would put
> together a study and publish it and would say that in 90% they consume
> much CPU power, would it then be enough? An opinion is based on
> personal, generally unsystematic thoughts and believe...
>
> > I dont know...Perhaps some users of those products might comment on thier
> > resource usages.
>
> Yeah, I loved to hear them, too. The problem is generally, that people
> accept the speed of their computer with PFW as they do not have a
> comparison to another computer without and most people don't make
> benchmarks test with and without PFW installed...
>
> Gerald
>
>
Ahh i see now...my opinion and experience is just that , whereas your
opinion and experience matches the general experience (in your
opinion).Its a fact that that kerio 2.1.5 and look n stop uses less cpu
and memory than practically all avs with a resident scanner.Before
suggesting anything else perhaps you should do some retests yourself.I
will continue to advise posters to use an outbound application firewall
rather than one without,and im sure you will continue to advise the
opposite.
respectfully.
me
- Next message: Bob : "Large .dmp.zip file from ZoneAlarm ..."
- Previous message: digital1111_at_hotmail.com: "Websense and Sonicwall"
- In reply to: Gerald Vogt: "Re: Microsoft Windows Firewall"
- Next in thread: Gerald Vogt: "Re: Microsoft Windows Firewall"
- Reply: Gerald Vogt: "Re: Microsoft Windows Firewall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
