Re: CheckPoint hide nat, static nat

From: Wolfgang Kueter (wolfgang_at_shconnect.de)
Date: 02/04/05


Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 06:07:28 +0100

deceptocon@gmail.com wrote:

> They may be seperated for security purposes

Nothing wrong with separating the internal networks and filtering traffic
between them.

> and even though NAT is not
> security some places like where Iwork require it.

There is no reason for NAT between the internal networks. (Strict) filtering
should be totally sufficient.

Wolfgang