Re: ZoneAlarm blocks FTP apps
From: Matt Beckwith (beckwith_at_wchsys.org)
Date: 01/22/05
- Next message: Camping Happily: "Kerio V 4.1 vs ICUII, Help Please..."
- Previous message: Melvin Klassen: "Re: ZoneAlarm blocks FTP apps"
- In reply to: Wolfgang Kueter: "Re: ZoneAlarm blocks FTP apps"
- Next in thread: Wolfgang Kueter: "Re: ZoneAlarm blocks FTP apps"
- Reply: Wolfgang Kueter: "Re: ZoneAlarm blocks FTP apps"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 22 Jan 2005 12:50:24 -0800
Wolfgang Kueter wrote:
> Wrong.
> Complete Nonsense.
> Again: Complete nonsense. If you IP is hidden, you don't get back a
single
> packet from any computer using whatever protocol. It is a problem
that has
> to do with the fact, that ftp use two (!) connections (command and
the data
> channel) using different ports and that there are two possibilities
(active
> and passive mode) about how the connection properties for the data
channel
> are handled and set up between client and server. When using active
mode,
> the client becomes the server and you need to allow an incoming
connection
> to Port 20.
> which is that have no clue. Play around with ftp connecttions using
both
> modes and sniff the traffic. Read the RfC describing the ftp
protocol,
> analyse the results from your sniffer.
This post insults, criticizes and then offers a bunch of gibberish that
doesn't help to solve the problem.
Spare us from techies who just want to feel superior but don't really
want to help.
- Next message: Camping Happily: "Kerio V 4.1 vs ICUII, Help Please..."
- Previous message: Melvin Klassen: "Re: ZoneAlarm blocks FTP apps"
- In reply to: Wolfgang Kueter: "Re: ZoneAlarm blocks FTP apps"
- Next in thread: Wolfgang Kueter: "Re: ZoneAlarm blocks FTP apps"
- Reply: Wolfgang Kueter: "Re: ZoneAlarm blocks FTP apps"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
