Re: NT 4 server firewall?
From: Leythos (void_at_nowhere.lan)
Date: 01/15/05
- Next message: Michael J. Pelletier: "Re: NT 4 server firewall?"
- Previous message: abspc: "Re: firewall with parental control filtering needed for usenet, p2p and web"
- In reply to: Bas Keur: "Re: NT 4 server firewall?"
- Next in thread: Al Dykes: "Re: NT 4 server firewall?"
- Reply:(deleted message) Al Dykes: "Re: NT 4 server firewall?"
- Reply:(deleted message) Bas Keur: "Re: NT 4 server firewall?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 04:19:30 GMT
In article <41e8896f$0$6222$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>, bas.keur@dmrt.net
says...
> > Software firewalls do not give security.
>
> Oh really ?
> Ever seen a CP-FW1 running on Trusted solaris ?
Sure I have, but have you ever seen FW-1 running on a production server
running NT 4 with all the production apps on it?
Not if it was setup according to CP specifications - the Firewall is
suppose to be a stand alone server with limited access.
Short of getting bridging firewall (same IP on both sides) there is
little the OP is going to do to protect the system (if the OP has
already followed the MS recommendations.)
-- -- spamfree999@rrohio.com (Remove 999 to reply to me)
- Next message: Michael J. Pelletier: "Re: NT 4 server firewall?"
- Previous message: abspc: "Re: firewall with parental control filtering needed for usenet, p2p and web"
- In reply to: Bas Keur: "Re: NT 4 server firewall?"
- Next in thread: Al Dykes: "Re: NT 4 server firewall?"
- Reply:(deleted message) Al Dykes: "Re: NT 4 server firewall?"
- Reply:(deleted message) Bas Keur: "Re: NT 4 server firewall?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
