Re: IRC-based Olympic Coverage
From: Charles Newman (charlesnewman1_at_comcast.net.spammers.will.be.shot.on.sight)
Date: 12/27/04
- Next message: Lars M. Hansen: "Re: IRC-based Olympic Coverage"
- Previous message: Cųllap§ed Lūng: "Advice on Firewall with Multi-user options needed."
- In reply to: Moe Trin: "Re: IRC-based Olympic Coverage"
- Next in thread: Moe Trin: "Re: IRC-based Olympic Coverage"
- Reply: Moe Trin: "Re: IRC-based Olympic Coverage"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 19:16:41 -0800
"Moe Trin" <ibuprofin@painkiller.example.tld> wrote in message
news:slrncsug0u.rpo.ibuprofin@compton.phx.az.us...
> businesses don't use Comcast. It's so loaded with zombie PCs run by
> clueless fools that many intelligent network admins block everything from
> there, just to protect their networks.
There is a version of Comcast, for business, known as
"Comcast Pro", available on some of their systems. It is
a version of Comcast high-speed internet meant for
business. At only $95 per month, it is cheaper than most
other business-oriented Internet services.
In fact, if I were to ever open my observatory, this is
what I would get for Internet service, if it were available
in the location where I was building it.
- Next message: Lars M. Hansen: "Re: IRC-based Olympic Coverage"
- Previous message: Cųllap§ed Lūng: "Advice on Firewall with Multi-user options needed."
- In reply to: Moe Trin: "Re: IRC-based Olympic Coverage"
- Next in thread: Moe Trin: "Re: IRC-based Olympic Coverage"
- Reply: Moe Trin: "Re: IRC-based Olympic Coverage"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]