Re: d-link DI-604
From: <©¿©> (user_at_127.0.0.1)
Date: 11/29/04
- Next message: news_at_blueyonder.co.uk: "Re: Linux Firewall or Netgear"
- Previous message: <©¿©>: "Re: Extending range of wireless network"
- In reply to: Duane Arnold: "Re: d-link DI-604"
- Next in thread: Duane Arnold: "Re: d-link DI-604"
- Reply: Duane Arnold: "Re: d-link DI-604"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 02:47:23 GMT
> The port is *closed* is all that counts You should try some other testing
> sites.
>
> Duane :)
>
Duane,
This is true...but...if you are scanning a network, to practice your
break-in skills, why sent a signal back to people looking to prove a
malicious point to their buddies. This is like parking your car under a
street light in the night. Why focus everybody's attention to your IP
address? Why do you want to let people know you are at IP aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd?
It is best to send it to an IP address that you will never use. Or, you can
get a Linksys router that is defaulted that way...
- Next message: news_at_blueyonder.co.uk: "Re: Linux Firewall or Netgear"
- Previous message: <©¿©>: "Re: Extending range of wireless network"
- In reply to: Duane Arnold: "Re: d-link DI-604"
- Next in thread: Duane Arnold: "Re: d-link DI-604"
- Reply: Duane Arnold: "Re: d-link DI-604"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|