Re: Kerio 2.1.5 vs. Kerio 4xx

From: Angus Rodgers (angusr_at_bigfoot.com)
Date: 11/15/04 

Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 21:27:38 +0000

On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 20:34:55 GMT, Damaeus
<no-mail@hotmail.invalid.net> wrote:

>So with respect to firewall-specific demands, is there anything
>that KPF 4.x does that's better than 2.1.5?

Well, it buggers up my (otherwise pretty stable) Win98SE
system much better! 2.1.5 was pathetic in this regard -
I never even noticed it was there, except when someone
tried to access my PC.

>How important is the monitoring of applications and its attempts
>to launch other apps?

Very important, if you really want to screw things up and
see lots of lovely blue screens!

>I'm thinking about downgrading to 2.1.5 because while there were
>fewer features, the older version just seems much simpler to use.

Ditto. 

-- 
Angus Rodgers
(angus_prune@ eats spam; reply to angusrod@)
Contains mild peril
Quantcast