Re: Windows Firewall alone
From: Sam (sam.sam_at_samsam.com)
Date: 11/14/04
- Next message: Franc Zabkar: "Re: ZoneAlarm & tvdumpflags"
- Previous message: optikl: "Re: Windows Firewall alone"
- In reply to: Tiny Johnson: "Re: Windows Firewall alone"
- Next in thread: Duane Arnold: "Re: Windows Firewall alone"
- Reply: Duane Arnold: "Re: Windows Firewall alone"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 17:57:40 -0000
Tiny Johnson said ...
> windows firewall is poor at best, additionally you should not use IE or
> outlook express, Firefox would be a better choice for browsers and web
> base mail is the safest, try yahoo mail
>
> usb for broadband is not the preferred method, ethernet is a better
> option
>
> NAT firewalled router is computer 101
>
> spywareblaster, spywareguard, adaware and spybot should be installed on
> everyones pc
>
You're right but I'm talking about a naive user who uses her computer
for email and internet browsing. I really don't think that she is
interested in installing all manner of other items - she needs something
that will act without her intervention. Spybot, etc - no way!
-- Sam
- Next message: Franc Zabkar: "Re: ZoneAlarm & tvdumpflags"
- Previous message: optikl: "Re: Windows Firewall alone"
- In reply to: Tiny Johnson: "Re: Windows Firewall alone"
- Next in thread: Duane Arnold: "Re: Windows Firewall alone"
- Reply: Duane Arnold: "Re: Windows Firewall alone"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|