Re: Linksys hardware firewall enough...?

From: Gary (garyd_at_efn.org.spamsux)
Date: 11/09/04 

Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 14:30:33 GMT

Leythos wrote:

> I would never consider trying to break into a network that I was not
> paid to hack/test.

Then how much do you charge?

> Gary, most of us have been doing this for a LONG time. Most of us were
> using NAT to segment our networks long before the home/soho routers came
> out on the markets. Most of us know that ROUTING is part of NAT and has
> nothing to do with firewalls.

You are also implying that I know nothing about the subject. And I'm not
sure why you keep dragging routing and NAT into the subject of packet
filtering. Every box that has a TCP/IP stack routes packets. Every box
that routes packets between public IP space and RFC 1918 space must
perform network address translation. It just so happens that every
firewall provides routing, NAT, and packet filtering. As we've all made
perfectly clear, better firewalls (including some in the SOHO class)
offer things like stateful packet inspection, VPN, VLAN tagging, etc. I
never once claimed that using only NAT is a good security measure.

> I'm not encouraging anyone to spend anything on anything, I'm warning
> them that the devices marketed as firewalls, that are only NAT Routers
> in reality, are NOT FIREWALLS - they are simple routers with some
> additional "firewall like" features.

Including devices by vendors that have paid for ICSA certification?
http://www.netgear.com/products/details/FR114P.php
http://www.netopia.com/equipment/intl/emea/uk/products/3300_ent.html

> You don't have to like the idea that security experts don't agree with
> you, you don't have to agree with us, but we're never going to accept
> your notion that those simple devices are firewalls.

Here's what we've learned so far:

1) Packet filtering is also known as OSI layer 3 (network) firewalling.
2) It is included in SOHO, SMB, and corporate class firewalls.
3) Firewalls alone do not make an effective security policy.

> Look at it this way, with your definition, a VLAN capable managed switch
> could be a firewall - and it's not even as close as the SOHO units you
> keep talking about.

It's not my definition. It's a definition laid out by pioneers in the
security industry. If you want to take up this issue with Marcus J.
Ranum, original author of the firewall FAQ, please see his website for
contact info: http://www.ranum.com

You can also contact Rik Farrow, Fred Avolio, Matt Curtin, D. Brent
Chapman, Elizabeth Zwicky, Bruce Schneier, Bill Cheswick, Steven
Bellovin, Avi Rubin, Dan Geer, Tina Bird, Daniel Hartmeier, etc.

-Gary

Relevant Pages

  • RE: NAT firewalls possibly insecure by nature?
    ... doing NAT, it should not be vulnerable to this type of attack. ... FYI, when I say "true" FW, I am referring to a device that looks at a packet ... NAT firewalls possibly insecure by nature? ... it seems like a software driver could be developed that acts as an ...
    (Focus-Microsoft)
  • Re: Probes on Port 135 and 445 continue
    ... > Of course the NAT would have to be smart, just like the NAT on most ... > broadband routers and firewalls is. ... I would agree that NAT routers distributed by Bellsouth and others ... will run the software to do auto config.] ...
    (comp.security.misc)
  • Re: Probes on Port 135 and 445 continue
    ... > Of course the NAT would have to be smart, just like the NAT on most ... > broadband routers and firewalls is. ... I would agree that NAT routers distributed by Bellsouth and others ... will run the software to do auto config.] ...
    (comp.security.unix)
  • Re: [fw-wiz] Internet accessible screened subnet - use public orprivate IPs?
    ... >The whole reason NAT was implemented was because of a very finite number of publicly routable IP addresses. ... The first firewalls I built offered NAT (inherent in the design and then later via ... "Proxy transparency" in Gauntlet) because a lot of the early firewall customers ... re-address their network or NAT ...
    (Firewall-Wizards)
  • Re: Best hardware firewall for home use?
    ... >>discussions on hardware firewalls for home use. ... If the low end Cable/DSL routers did not do NAT, ...
    (comp.security.firewalls)