Should I open port 50 on my firewall
From: Tigger (tiggerdakat_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 09/30/04
- Next message: Moe Trin: "Re: Can't access WAN IP's with Cayman and SBC"
- Previous message: Anthony Virga: "Re: What ports to keep open?"
- Next in thread: T. Sean Weintz: "Re: Should I open port 50 on my firewall"
- Reply: T. Sean Weintz: "Re: Should I open port 50 on my firewall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 30 Sep 2004 10:58:03 -0700
We have two groups of people setting up an SA to our sonicwall. One
has been successful without changing any access rules in the
sonciwall.
The other could not create a vpn tunnel without creating an access
rule that looks like this:
IPSEC (ESP) [0,50]
Source (the remote ip address of the VPN) WAN
Destination *
Would a rule like this compromise our LAN and/or firewall in any way.
It has always been my experience that we didn't have to open up any
ports or create any services on our Sonicwall.
Any thoughts would be appreciated.
- Next message: Moe Trin: "Re: Can't access WAN IP's with Cayman and SBC"
- Previous message: Anthony Virga: "Re: What ports to keep open?"
- Next in thread: T. Sean Weintz: "Re: Should I open port 50 on my firewall"
- Reply: T. Sean Weintz: "Re: Should I open port 50 on my firewall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
