Stealth vs Closed ports and firewalls
From: Kerodo (kerodonospamkenny_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 09/29/04
- Next message: Frustrated ZoneAlarm: "Re: ZoneAlarm Pro looses Settings"
- Previous message: Kaptain Krunch: "Re: How to prevent system from replying to Ping (ICMP Echo) requests?"
- Next in thread: Casey: "Re: Stealth vs Closed ports and firewalls"
- Reply: Casey: "Re: Stealth vs Closed ports and firewalls"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:20:07 -0700
I'm playing with an old version of ZoneAlarm 2.6 here just for fun, and
it gives you the option of running without stealth mode, which is
interesting. I turn stealth off and go test at grc.com. Grc tells me
that most of my ports are Closed, but 1025 is Open (Ms Task Scheduler on
Win2k here). So I assume that closed ports is fine, but anything Open
is vulnerable and should be closed. Right?
I'm used to the stealth mode in most firewalls today. If I put ZA into
stealth mode, I notice that it also blocks access to port 1025 which MS
Task is listening on. But in Non-Stealth mode, ZA doesn't even ask me
about the incoming connection attempt. Why is this? Shouldn't the
firewall ask about any incoming connections to listening ports?
-- Kerodo
- Next message: Frustrated ZoneAlarm: "Re: ZoneAlarm Pro looses Settings"
- Previous message: Kaptain Krunch: "Re: How to prevent system from replying to Ping (ICMP Echo) requests?"
- Next in thread: Casey: "Re: Stealth vs Closed ports and firewalls"
- Reply: Casey: "Re: Stealth vs Closed ports and firewalls"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|