Re: Multiple External IP's on the WAN Interface
From: Ken (ng3122_at_ke9nr.#nospam#.net)
Date: 09/18/04
- Next message: Blevins: "Re: Best AV prog for XP = KAV 5 right?"
- Previous message: DJ: "Re: Sygate"
- In reply to: JP: "Multiple External IP's on the WAN Interface"
- Next in thread: JP: "Re: Multiple External IP's on the WAN Interface"
- Reply: JP: "Re: Multiple External IP's on the WAN Interface"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 11:02:11 -0700
Hi Joe -
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 03:44:38 GMT, "JP"
<NO_SPAM_PLEASE_pangjo@netzero.com> wrote:
>Or am I looking at the wrong
>direction? I think I should consider using header addresses on the web
>server instead.
With all sites on the same server, you should consider using
name-based virtual hosting. Only one IP address is needed.
For Apache 2, see
http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/vhosts/name-based.html
Even if you're not using Apache, read the first section anyway for a
discussion of "Name-based vs. IP-based Virtual Hosts".
Note that SSL (https) cannot be name-based. If you have more than one
SSL site, you will have to have more than one IP address; one IP
address per SSL site.
-- Ken http://www.ke9nr.net/
- Next message: Blevins: "Re: Best AV prog for XP = KAV 5 right?"
- Previous message: DJ: "Re: Sygate"
- In reply to: JP: "Multiple External IP's on the WAN Interface"
- Next in thread: JP: "Re: Multiple External IP's on the WAN Interface"
- Reply: JP: "Re: Multiple External IP's on the WAN Interface"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|