Re: Kerio PFW 2.14 - Safe?
From: \ (dvader_at_deathstar.mil)
Date: 09/08/04
- Next message: RaYzor: "Re: ZoneAlarm Pro 4.5x + XP SP2 = crash"
- Previous message: Casey: "Re: Kerio PFW 2.14 - Safe?"
- In reply to: Peter Boulton: "Re: Kerio PFW 2.14 - Safe?"
- Next in thread: Mailman: "Re: Kerio PFW 2.14 - Safe?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 14:55:23 -0400
>More bloated than 2.14 (or 2.15, which I tracked down after I posted my
>question). So come one - is 2.15 compromised because it's old software?
No, I don't think so. In fact, the older it is the more time there has been for
vulnerabilities to surface. Newer firewalls just have more stuff, not
necessarily better security. A bigger worry with a firewall that is no longer
supported is that it may not be compatible with some later operating system
update.
-- Dave "Crash" Dummy - A weapon of mass destruction crash@gpick.com?subject=Techtalk (Do not alter!) http://lists.gpick.com
- Next message: RaYzor: "Re: ZoneAlarm Pro 4.5x + XP SP2 = crash"
- Previous message: Casey: "Re: Kerio PFW 2.14 - Safe?"
- In reply to: Peter Boulton: "Re: Kerio PFW 2.14 - Safe?"
- Next in thread: Mailman: "Re: Kerio PFW 2.14 - Safe?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|