Re: "small caps"

From: Sam (email_at_me.not)
Date: 09/06/04 

Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2004 11:54:56 -0500

On Mon, 6 Sep 2004 10:15:49 -0400, "Uncle Mortimer" <lost@sea.invalid>
wrote:

>
>"Sam" <email@me.not> wrote in message news:kl3nj058of8tmeu9365qoeb00633ppanhk@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 5 Sep 2004 17:50:30 -0400, "Uncle Mortimer" <lost@sea.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >"Sam" <email@me.not> wrote in message news:24vmj0d8ci3r8c89r1693mcu51hqc09uag@4ax.com...
>> >> On Sun, 5 Sep 2004 18:27:57 +0200, Gabriele Neukam
>> >> <Gabriele.Spamfighter.Neukam@t-online.de> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >On that special day, Kurt, (kurtl@olypen.com) said...
>> >> >
>> >> >> Small Caps? :-)
>> >> >
>> >> >(sigh) non-caps, small letters, dunno the proper term.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >Gabriele Neukam
>> >> >
>> >> >Gabriele.Spamfighter.Neukam@t-online.de
>> >>
>> >> First, I thought "small caps" for "lower case" made no sense. However,
>> >> it may be a reference to key caps rather than capitol letters.
>> >>
>> >> BTW, there is such a thing as small capitol letters. I used to have a
>> >> printer that would print them.
>> >
>> >Capitol letters like DC?
>> >
>>
>> No, half that height/width or less. Didn't you see he word "small",
>> which this whole thing was about?
>
>No, but I did see capitol where capital belonged :-PPPP
>

So you worry about little things and ignore big ones, like whole
words. That's normal. "normal" is a common, and undesirable condition.

Quantcast