Re: Possible firewall problem?
From: Alan Illeman (illemann_at_surfbest.net)
Date: 08/31/04
- Next message: NeoSadist: "Re: ZA and Bearshare"
- Previous message: ---------> That Way!: "Re: is my firewall working"
- In reply to: Copelandia Cyanescens: "Re: Possible firewall problem?"
- Next in thread: Copelandia Cyanescens: "Re: Possible firewall problem?"
- Reply: Copelandia Cyanescens: "Re: Possible firewall problem?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 20:47:14 -0400
"Copelandia Cyanescens" <synesthesia@ix02x67invalid.net> wrote in message
news:13rn8hnmkmp0w@x02x67invalid.net...
> Kerodo wrote...
>
> >> Stateful inspection is a good thing, but whether or not it's necessary
> >> in your case probably depends on your typical Internet usage. for the
> >> average "grab email and browse the web" user it's probably not
> >> necessary.
> >
> > My typical internet usage is just email, newsgroups and browsing.
> > Pretty simple. I just wondered if stateful inspection was hype or
> > really an advantage. Sounds like it's an advantage, so that's good.
> > Thanks for your explanations...
>
> Not a problem. :)
>
> Stateful inspection, like most things, is good and bad. It certainly
> gives the firewall another tool to use in securing your PC, but delving
> into the realm of theory it could also open up additional holes. If an
> attacker could successfully guess packet sequence numbers or spoof IP
> addresses, the firewall might pass malicious activity a simple packet
> filter would not. Same goes for activity originated by malicious
> software residing on your machine. If a virus or other malware could
> successfully establish a connection, a pure stateful inspector would
> likely let it do its thing. :(
>
> And no, I'm not aware of any *specific* attacks of this nature. I also
> realize that firewalls implement stateful inspection in addition to
> packet filtering and generic rules based filtering, not in stead of. So
> in general, a stateful firewall is preferable to a packet filter IMO. On
> a typical single user's machine it's probably more of a "nice to have if
> you ever need it" sorta thing with the "ever need it" part being pretty
> unlikely. ;)
Interesting stuff, you certainly seem to know what you're talking
about, thanks for the info! Like Kerodo I'm using Kerio 2.1.5 and
have been virus-free since I set it up in March.
Alan
- Next message: NeoSadist: "Re: ZA and Bearshare"
- Previous message: ---------> That Way!: "Re: is my firewall working"
- In reply to: Copelandia Cyanescens: "Re: Possible firewall problem?"
- Next in thread: Copelandia Cyanescens: "Re: Possible firewall problem?"
- Reply: Copelandia Cyanescens: "Re: Possible firewall problem?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|