Re: any suggestion for a good hardware firewall
From: Leythos (void_at_nowhere.com)
Date: 08/27/04
- Next message: Duane Arnold: "Re: WG SOHO 6 and print server."
- Previous message: D.Rider: "ZA (free) outbound only settings"
- In reply to:(deleted message) shopping.nowthor.com: "Re: any suggestion for a good hardware firewall"
- Next in thread: shopping.nowthor.com: "Re: any suggestion for a good hardware firewall"
- Reply:(deleted message) shopping.nowthor.com: "Re: any suggestion for a good hardware firewall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 02:32:15 GMT
In article <pt6ti051oolv86kmt14f9tbi4ulagd9fio@4ax.com>,
nospam@shopping.nowthor.com says...
> On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 02:13:16 GMT, Leythos <void@nowhere.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Leythos, why do you keep ignoring the ZyWALL's? ;-)
> >
> >Because, from all I've read on their site, all of them under $1000 are
> >just glorified NAT/SPI devices that offer little more than a high-end
> >linksys BEFSX41 unit or a BEFVP41 unit does. Sure, they have more CPU
> >power to manage VPN encryption, but that's the only advantage I see in
> >their documents.
> >
>
> What makes you say that? Besides being ICSA-certified firewalls, they
> most certainly do much more than NAT. In reality, you don't even have
> to do NAT. The firewall works just fine by itself.
Other than being certified, all of the documents, including the large
users manual, points to doing NAT and port forwarding as their means of
protection. From the look of it you can only assign one subnet on the
LAN side and one IP on the public side - this makes it a residential
firewall appliance. Most firewalls, at least the ones I'm installing and
using, allow for entire class A/B/C networks on the public network and
multiple subnets on each LAN or DMZ port - you would use something like
this in between the Plant Floor network and the Business Office network,
or between a office network and the accounting department systems...
Once nice thing about the firebox is that it can work in drop-in mode,
which means there is no NAT port mapping needed.
-- -- spamfree999@rrohio.com (Remove 999 to reply to me)
- Next message: Duane Arnold: "Re: WG SOHO 6 and print server."
- Previous message: D.Rider: "ZA (free) outbound only settings"
- In reply to:(deleted message) shopping.nowthor.com: "Re: any suggestion for a good hardware firewall"
- Next in thread: shopping.nowthor.com: "Re: any suggestion for a good hardware firewall"
- Reply:(deleted message) shopping.nowthor.com: "Re: any suggestion for a good hardware firewall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|