Re: Statefull Packer Inspection against Malware attacks!
From: Greg Hennessy (me_at_privacy.net)
Date: 08/15/04
- Next message: Greg Hennessy: "Re: Statefull Packer Inspection against Malware attacks!"
- Previous message: Thor Kottelin: "Re: Port 80 again"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Micheal Robert Zium: "Re: Statefull Packer Inspection against Malware attacks!"
- Next in thread: Micheal Robert Zium: "Re: Statefull Packer Inspection against Malware attacks!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 10:24:41 +0100
On 14 Aug 2004 21:12:46 -0500, Micheal Robert Zium
<mrozium@XSPAMX-yahoo.com> wrote:
>Greg Hennessy wrote:
>
>>>http://www.netfilter.org/documentation/HOWTO//netfilter-extensions-HOWTO-3.html#ss3.18
>>
>>As useful as teats on a bull.
>
>And just exactly how are you qualified to make that statement?
Unlike the idiot who asserted that he would willingly break '100 rfcs'
(sic) to secure a network.
Ones bona fides here and elsewhere are long established.
You snipped the bit detailing why packet based regex is a waste of time.
greg
-- Es ist mein Teil - nein Mein Teil - nein Denn das ist mein Teil - nein Mein Teil - nein
- Next message: Greg Hennessy: "Re: Statefull Packer Inspection against Malware attacks!"
- Previous message: Thor Kottelin: "Re: Port 80 again"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Micheal Robert Zium: "Re: Statefull Packer Inspection against Malware attacks!"
- Next in thread: Micheal Robert Zium: "Re: Statefull Packer Inspection against Malware attacks!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|