Re: Do you use HOSTS file ?
From: K2NNJ (ktwonnj_at_NOSPAMoptonline.net)
Date: 07/26/04
- Previous message: *Vanguard*: "Re: Do you use HOSTS file ?"
- In reply to: Duane Arnold: "Re: Do you use HOSTS file ?"
- Next in thread: Lars M. Hansen: "Re: Do you use HOSTS file ?"
- Reply: Lars M. Hansen: "Re: Do you use HOSTS file ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 03:15:13 GMT
France!.....ewwwwwwwww
Boycott France!
"Duane Arnold" <notme@notme.com> wrote in message
news:y2YMc.29025$eM2.6902@attbi_s51...
> >
> >
> > Programmershouse wrote:
> >
> >> I wrote a page about Host File and how to use it.
> >> http://www.ifrance.com/programmershouse/HOSTS-EN.HTML
> >> What do you think about it and what else more could I add to it ?
> >
> > You cannot know the absolute location of the hosts file. For example,
> > the hosts file of the XP machine I'm writing this on is not located
> > where you state it is.
>
> Based on the information in the link, the HOST file is at that location
> on my Win 2k and XP Pro machines. Where else is the HOST file going to be
> located on a NT based O/S? On Win 9'x and ME, it's in C:\windows I think.
>
> If the HOST file is in play on the O/S, then I have not seen a command
> the can be set to direct the O/S to look else where for the Host file.
>
> > Neither is my browser cache. You are writing in
> > second person when you mean first.
>
> That's on my XP Pro machine.
>
> C:\Documents and Settings\username\Local Settings\Temporary Internet
> Files"
>
> >
> >> Stickman answered me : "Unfortunately, using the hosts file to block
> >> unwanted content is terribly inefficient."
> >> Why is that ?
> >
> > Because it blocks nothing - it works by breaking name lookups. It
> > isn't even on topic for comp.security.firewalls. Follow-ups set.
>
> I think it's a good tool to block the browser redirects to a site where
> the dubious site can download something to the machine. If the HOST is in
> play and the Domain Name being redirected to is in the HOST file using
> the Loopback IP, then the redirect is going to be stopped.
>
> I expect any program Web application or not that's using a URL to access
> a site and the Domain Name is in the HOST file with 127.0.0.1, then I
> expect the contact to be stopped by the machine.
>
> However, if IE is using the proxy setting, then the HOST file is
> bypassed.
>
> I use the HOST on my machines and have no problems in doing so. I think
> it's a limited measure to protect the machine, IMHO. The HOST file should
> be locked down as it can be hacked.
>
> Duane :)
>
>
- Previous message: *Vanguard*: "Re: Do you use HOSTS file ?"
- In reply to: Duane Arnold: "Re: Do you use HOSTS file ?"
- Next in thread: Lars M. Hansen: "Re: Do you use HOSTS file ?"
- Reply: Lars M. Hansen: "Re: Do you use HOSTS file ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|