Re: Stealth test with router and without router
From: \ (dvader_at_deathstar.mil)
Date: 06/29/04
- Previous message: Bit Twister: "Re: do firewalls really work?"
- In reply to: Mike: "Stealth test with router and without router"
- Next in thread: Willie Nickels: "Re: Stealth test with router and without router"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:13:32 -0400
>I gather the
>test in the first scenario was testing the routerand not the computer ports.
>Is this true,
Yes, it's true.
> and what significance if any are the differing results? Is it a case of
> paranoia or is of significance?
It is only significant if you think "stealth" is important. I don't, but
opinions vary. Closed is closed. In either case, the requests are not getting
through. If you want everything stealthy, you will have to see if your router
has that capability. I don't have an answer for that.
-- Dave "Crash" Dummy - A weapon of mass destruction crash@gpick.com?subject=Techtalk (Do not alter!) http://lists.gpick.com
- Previous message: Bit Twister: "Re: do firewalls really work?"
- In reply to: Mike: "Stealth test with router and without router"
- Next in thread: Willie Nickels: "Re: Stealth test with router and without router"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]