Re: Bottom vs. Top Posting
From: FromTheRafters (!0000_at_nomad.fake)
Date: 05/31/04
- Next message: James Salisbury: "Real Player and MS Media Player via a NAT firewall"
- Previous message: Tom Holden: "Re: SMC Router Firewall Blocks Access to WAN Addresses 255, 0"
- In reply to: Renegade: "Re: Bottom vs. Top Posting"
- Next in thread: Shane: "Re: Bottom vs. Top Posting"
- Reply: Shane: "Re: Bottom vs. Top Posting"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 18:34:10 -0400
"Renegade" <not@t.all> wrote in message news:pan.2004.05.30.16.46.15.969818@t.all...
> One thing that I have never understood about the top posting argument...
> have you ever noticed that almost always it involves being crossposted to
> several groups?
That hasn't been my experience, more often than not it is due to
regulars in the groups I frequent outright refusing to "get in line"
and quit being such non-conformists. ;o)
> Multiple crossposting is considered bad netiquette too,
> just like top posting.
I get a kick out of people who complain about "off topic" posts when
it is obvious that massive crossposting is in use - and to widely varied
topical groups. This selection of groups isn't so bad, if you can manage
to fit ferrets in with computer security issues.
I heard somewhere that ferrets predate cats as household pets, is there
any truth to that?
...and is it recommended that you disable your security programs when
installing new software?
> That is why the better newsreaders will warn you
> that you are crossposting.
I don't initiate crossposts, but I do reply to them. I have no way of
knowing what group(s) the person I am discussing something with
is reading in unless he or she sets a followup-to. When they do, I
at least attempt to read that group in case that discussion continues.
As far as top/bottom goes, it would make for better readability if
people would just follow suit with whatever style the first respondent
in a subthread uses - and just quit quibbling.
- Next message: James Salisbury: "Real Player and MS Media Player via a NAT firewall"
- Previous message: Tom Holden: "Re: SMC Router Firewall Blocks Access to WAN Addresses 255, 0"
- In reply to: Renegade: "Re: Bottom vs. Top Posting"
- Next in thread: Shane: "Re: Bottom vs. Top Posting"
- Reply: Shane: "Re: Bottom vs. Top Posting"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|