Re: Survive without ICMP?
From: Maxime Ducharme (mducharme_at_cybergeneration.com)
Date: 05/21/04
- Previous message: Purl Gurl: "Re: Survive without ICMP?"
- In reply to: Purl Gurl: "Re: Survive without ICMP?"
- Next in thread: Alan Illeman: "Re: Survive without ICMP?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 15:31:23 GMT
"Purl Gurl" <purlgurl@purlgurl.net> wrote in message
news:40AE182D.DF340FFA@purlgurl.net...
> (snipped)
>
>
> Now I am questioning if this is "always" true. There
> is mounting evidence which contradicts this, but there
> are so many variables involved, I am having extreme
> difficulties proving or dismissing.
this is not as hard as you are saying
"stealth" is a word used on many sites and in many
programs, and means "no response"
isnt it clear ?
there is no other possibilities, as long as you are
talking about UDP and TCP ports
ICMP is not involved in "stealth" concept
>
> I have an article response to Stalks, time stamped
> just before this one. Greater details are afforded.
> You might find my testing of nmap and results to
> be of personal interest to you.
nope, thx
>
> Purl Gurl
Maxime
- Previous message: Purl Gurl: "Re: Survive without ICMP?"
- In reply to: Purl Gurl: "Re: Survive without ICMP?"
- Next in thread: Alan Illeman: "Re: Survive without ICMP?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]