Re: WinVNC
From: *Vanguard* (no-email_at_post-reply-in-newsgroup.invalid)
Date: 04/29/04
- Previous message: Spacen Jasset: "Re: WinVNC"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Leythos: "Re: WinVNC"
- Next in thread: Leythos: "Re: WinVNC"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 16:56:16 -0500
"Leythos" (void@nowhere.com) said in
news:MPG.1afb1ce1f11245f98a464@news-server.columbus.rr.com:
> In article <KeGdnT-mv-Sg0wzdRVn-hA@comcast.com>,
> no-email@post-reply-in- newsgroup.invalid says...
>> But the OP said the potential customers CAN browse web pages. If
>> they are still using the default port 80 to do so, why wouldn't the
>> VNC client which was also using port 80 be able to get through?
>
> Most hospitals have an IT policy the prohibits people from installing
> or running applications which were not installed or authorized by the
> IT department.
>
> Every hospital I've done IT work for would fire/reprimand someone for
> installing VNC.
>
> --
But the user is NOT *installing* it if it runs from a floppy. It runs
from the floppy. It doesn't install any files onto their computer. So
the hospitals policy would also have to include RUNNING any programs
that are not on their okay list.
-- ____________________________________________________________ *** Post replies to newsgroup. Share with others. *** Email: domain = ".com" and append "=news=" to Subject. ____________________________________________________________
- Previous message: Spacen Jasset: "Re: WinVNC"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Leythos: "Re: WinVNC"
- Next in thread: Leythos: "Re: WinVNC"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
