Re: Checkpoint SDL. How to support over this
From: rc (rc_at_spam.com)
Date: 04/25/04
- Previous message: SMChristenson: "Re: BEFSX41 -- I give up"
- In reply to: zenner: "Re: Checkpoint SDL. How to support over this"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 20:26:51 +0100
This may or may not help but there is a reg hack that allows Dial Up
connection to stay open after log off. I am not sure what it is but I
have seen it. do a google search
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004 19:06:04 GMT, "zenner" <zenner <nospam>@atall.net>
wrote:
>You are saying that to install application software (not a CheckPoint
>delivered update, thru SDS)...you have required your Domain users to drop
>the Domain user ID and logon as local/administrator on the desktop, to
>complete the install.
>
>Your question seems to be if wanting to restore access to the domain from
>the non-domain, local ID, why does the Domain require the user to logon
>(authenticate) as a Domain user? I further suppose your question centers on
>whether this is an issue with CheckPoint or with Microsoft Domain security?
>Is that about it?
>
>
>"Jason" <jason.nichols@derwent.co.uk> wrote in message
>news:688f8832.0404220903.7c6391b4@posting.google.com...
>> Firstly, sorry if this is a cross post the Checkpoint group seems to
>> be duff.
>>
>> On to the problem. Users login to our Domain using SDL work great,
>> login scripts work etc, etc. My problem is if a user needs an upgrade
>> software installed we have to login in to the machine as a Local /
>> Domain Admin. As soon as we log off the connection cuts.
>>
>> I assume this is by desging as we are using SDL but can anyone see a
>> way of keeping the connecton open so the support group can do their
>> work?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Jason
>
>
>---
>Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>Version: 6.0.663 / Virus Database: 426 - Release Date: 4/20/2004
>
- Previous message: SMChristenson: "Re: BEFSX41 -- I give up"
- In reply to: zenner: "Re: Checkpoint SDL. How to support over this"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|